May 17, 2013

How much do you need to retire?

Posted by Chloe Lutts Jensen

“How much do you need to retire? (Or, if you are already retired, how much can you safely spend?) These are the most important financial questions that our clients face. Although each family’s situation may call for a different answer, there are some guidelines that will serve most investors well.

“In October 1994, William Bengen published an article in the Journal of Financial Planning in which he analyzed (using Ibbotson data) how much an investor with 50% in the S&P 500 and 50% in intermediate-term Treasury notes could safety withdraw without depleting his savings. He found that for all 30-year periods covered within the data available to him, an investor could withdraw 4% of principal initially and increase that amount with inflation without running out of money. Subsequent to the publication of his study, it turned out that investors who had started drawing on their retirement assets in the mid-1960s would have run out of money in less than 30 years after the ravages of the 1966-1982 period (when inflation outpaced stock and bond returns).

“The problem with the conclusions of that study is the doubt that stocks and bonds will match their long-term historical returns in the future. This is especially true in the case of bonds where the historical return of 5.4%/year total return in the Ibbotson series is mathematically improbable with interest rates as low as they are now.

Read More »

April 18, 2013

A Safe Income and Growth Strategy

Posted by Chloe Lutts Jensen

In today’s Income Insights, in an article excerpted from The MoneyLetter, The Investment Reporter Editor Marc Johnson lays out some of his rules for designing a growth-and-income portfolio that won’t expose you to too much risk.

“Trying to squeeze income and capital growth from a single portfolio is the right choice for many investors. At the same time, however, it can lead to costly errors. But you can do it if you pay attention to some basic rules.

Read More »

February 15, 2013

Are Dividend-Paying Stocks a Good Investment for 2013?

Posted by Charles B. Carlson

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times . . . While most of you recognize this famous line as the opening to Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities, you could use the line to describe dividend investing in 2012. On the one hand, it truly was the best of times in terms of dividend increases. According to Standard & Poor’s, 2012 saw 2,883 positive dividend actions, up nearly 48% from 2011 and more than double the 1,191 positive actions recorded in 2009.  Read More »

December 15, 2012

Will higher taxes on dividends hurt high-yield stocks?

Posted by Gerald Appel

“It seems inevitable that taxes on qualified stock dividends will increase in 2013. The only question is by how much. In the absence of new legislation to the contrary, the top federal rate on qualified dividends will jump from 15% currently to 43.4% (top income tax rate of 39.6% plus 3.8% Obamacare tax on unearned income). Conventional wisdom holds that any major increase in taxes on dividends will operate to the detriment of high-dividend stocks by virtue of making them less attractive on an after-tax basis relative to other income investments.  Read More »

October 19, 2012

Are High-Yield Stocks Expensive?

Posted by Richard Moroney, CFA

“High-yield stocks are performing well. The top quintile, or one-fifth, of dividend-paying stocks in the S&P 500 Index as measured by yield has outperformed the average stock in the index in five of the last six calendar months. And in rolling 12-month periods since the start of 2009, the top- yielding quintile has outperformed by an average of 5.8%. Unfortunately, when a group of stocks performs well, it often becomes expensive. So, how do high-yielders look today? Read More »